PP
Home/Blog/The Founder's Tech Stack Guide: Choosing the Right Tools Before You Build
Engineering
5 January 2026
6 min read

The Founder's Tech Stack Guide: Choosing the Right Tools Before You Build

The tech decisions that actually matter for your startup, and the ones that don't matter at all. An opinionated guide from someone who's built a lot of products.

Tech StackStartupsWeb DevelopmentArchitecture
AG

Hey, my name is Anthony. I started Product In Your Pocket to help people build software that works. I hope you enjoy this read. Reach out to me on LinkedIn or contact us if you have any questions.

Most founders spend too long on this decision

Here's a secret: for 90% of startups, the specific tech stack doesn't matter. What matters is picking something proven and moving fast. I've seen founders spend weeks debating React vs Vue when they haven't talked to a single customer yet.

That said, some decisions do matter. Here's my opinionated guide to the ones worth thinking about and the ones you should just default on.

The decisions that matter

1. Where does your data live?

This is the most important technical decision you'll make early on. Your database is the hardest thing to change later.

My recommendation: Supabase

Why: It gives you a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, and storage in one package. No DevOps required. Generous free tier. Scales when you need it.

When to choose something else:

  • MongoDB if your data is truly unstructured and you're handling lots of different document shapes
  • Firebase if you're building a mobile-first app and want the tightest possible integration with Android/iOS
  • Plain PostgreSQL on Railway if you want more control and don't need the extras

When it doesn't matter: If you're building an MVP with under 1,000 users, any of these will work fine. Pick one and move on.

2. How do users log in?

Authentication is boring but critical. Get it wrong and you have security vulnerabilities. Build it yourself and you'll spend weeks on password reset flows instead of your actual product.

My recommendation: Use your database provider's auth

Supabase Auth, Firebase Auth, or Clerk. Don't build auth from scratch. Ever. The time you'd spend building login, signup, password reset, email verification, and session management is time you should spend on the thing that makes your product unique.

When to choose something else:

  • Clerk if you need advanced features like multi-factor auth, organisation management, or beautiful pre-built UI components
  • Auth0 if you're in a regulated industry and need enterprise-grade compliance

3. How do you take payments?

If your product charges money, this decision matters on day one.

My recommendation: Stripe

It's the standard for a reason. Great documentation, handles subscriptions and one-time payments, works in New Zealand, and the AI coding tools know it well (which matters if you're iterating fast).

When to choose something else:

  • Polar if you're selling digital products or subscriptions and want a simpler setup
  • Lemon Squeezy if you want to avoid dealing with tax compliance yourself (they act as merchant of record)

The decisions that don't matter (yet)

CSS framework

Use Tailwind CSS. Move on. Yes, there are other options. No, they won't make or break your product. Tailwind is fast to write, produces small bundles, and every AI tool in 2026 writes excellent Tailwind.

State management

Don't add Redux, Zustand, or MobX on day one. React's built-in useState and useContext handle most MVPs. Add a state management library when you actually have state management problems, not before.

Monorepo vs multi-repo

You have one app. Use one repo. This decision becomes relevant when you have 5 engineers and 3 services. You have neither.

Testing framework

Jest or Vitest. They're basically the same. Pick the one your framework recommends. Write tests for the critical path and move on.

CI/CD

Vercel handles deployment. GitHub handles version control. Push to main, it deploys. That's your CI/CD pipeline for the first 6 months.

My default stack (and why)

Here's what I reach for on every new project:

LayerToolWhy
FrameworkNext.jsFull-stack in one framework. Server rendering, API routes, static generation.
DatabaseSupabasePostgreSQL + auth + real-time + storage. One dashboard.
StylingTailwind CSSFast to write. AI writes it well. Small bundles.
UI Componentsshadcn/uiBeautiful, accessible, copy-paste components. No dependency bloat.
HostingVercelPush to deploy. CDN. Serverless. Zero config.
PaymentsStripeThe standard. Great docs. Works in NZ.
EmailResendClean API. Good deliverability. Built for developers.
AIClaude / OpenAIDepends on the use case. Claude for reasoning, GPT for general tasks.
AutomationInngest / n8nBackground jobs and workflow automation without the infrastructure headache.

This stack is boring on purpose. Every tool here is well-documented, widely used, and plays nicely with the others. That means fewer surprises, faster development, and easier debugging.

Stacks for specific scenarios

B2B SaaS

The default stack above, plus:

  • Multi-tenancy. Supabase row-level security or a tenant column.
  • Billing. Stripe subscriptions with usage-based pricing.
  • Analytics. PostHog (self-hosted or cloud).

Marketplace / two-sided platform

The default stack, plus:

  • Search. Algolia or Meilisearch for fast product/service search.
  • Messaging. Supabase real-time or Stream for buyer-seller communication.
  • Payments. Stripe Connect for split payments.

AI-powered product

The default stack, plus:

  • LLM provider. Anthropic Claude or OpenAI depending on the task.
  • Vector database. Supabase pgvector (it's built in) for semantic search.
  • Orchestration. Simple function chains. Don't use LangChain unless you actually need it.

Mobile-first consumer app

Swap the framework layer:

  • Framework. React Native or Expo for cross-platform mobile.
  • Navigation. Expo Router.
  • Everything else stays the same

The three rules

  1. Pick proven tools. Boring technology is a feature, not a bug. Let other startups beta-test the new hotness.
  2. Minimise the number of tools. Every tool you add is a tool you need to learn, maintain, and pay for. Start with the minimum.
  3. Optimise for speed of iteration, not speed of execution. Your first version will be wrong. Make it easy to change.

The biggest mistake

The biggest tech stack mistake isn't choosing the wrong framework. It's spending so long choosing that you never build anything.

Pick a stack. Build the thing. Talk to users. Iterate. The tech stack that ships beats the perfect tech stack that doesn't.

Book a free consultation if you want help choosing the right stack for your specific product.

About us

We turn your goals into AI and software that actually works

A team of product engineers based in Queenstown, NZ. We work with you to understand the problem first, then build the right thing — not just the possible thing.

Book a consultation